Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, having a general score of 85.5 against 84.6. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, but it is somewhat lighter. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 768 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A22 5G has greater battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A22 5G captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.