Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than Galaxy A25 5G, having a overall score of 85.5 against 79.9. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is incredibly older and just a little thicker than Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is still a little bit lighter. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a just a little lower pixels amount in each inch of screen, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.