Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is somewhat lighter than Galaxy A35 5G, although it is a little bit thicker and was released many years before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a quite smaller display, and they both have the same screen brightness, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a bit greater pixel count per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a camera with a way better resolution, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.