Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with a 90.8 score against 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a newer and a little thinner phone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it's also a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2246, a bit smaller display and a just a little worse pixels density. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 256 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy A51 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures.
Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.