Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a 90.7 score against 85.5. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a way newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, although it's just a bit heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, a quite smaller display and a quite lower screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A52, because although it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much more MP camera in the back, a larger aperture and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a little bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.