Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is slightly better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with a 91.3 score against 85.5. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's body is newer and a little thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, although it is a little heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a little bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an external SD slot that allows up to 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy A52 5G captures better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.