Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is a little lighter but somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs more than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.