Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's general score of 85.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a newer and just a little thinner phone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it is also just a little heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have 8 cores and 8 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2246 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater count of pixels in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW captures better videos and photos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 744 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.