Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's general score of 85.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, it's heavier and just a bit thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better display than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, it also counts with a little bit more brightness and a quite better count of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy F62, because although it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.