Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a 97.6 score against 85.5. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a newer and way thinner phone than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it's also incredibly heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Galaxy Fold features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold's camera is just as good as Xiaomi Pocophone F1's camera, and although the Galaxy Fold has a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography, they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a 12 mega-pixels back-facing camera and a same size back camera sensor.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.