Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a bit better than Galaxy M30, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 82.4. Although it's the best in this comparison, Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design is just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy M30. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels count per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy M30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy M30, because although it has an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy M30 has greater battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25% larger battery size. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a worse resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a bigger sensor and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.