Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting an 87.7 score against 85.5. Although Samsung Galaxy M51 is noticeably newer than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, it is a little thicker and heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy M51, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 captures better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.