Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-08-29 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's score of 79.5. Even though Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note7, it's just a little heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and the Galaxy Note7 have very similar displays, because although the Galaxy Note7 has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen pixel density. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more internal storage.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor and a tinier aperture which is worse for taking pictures in low light situations, and they both have a 12 megapixels back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with higher video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.