Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 7.1 Nougat |
| 2018-08-29 | 2018-01-09 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Galaxy On7 Prime, having a global score of 85.5 against 76.9. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a little higher display pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy On7 Prime, because although it has a camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy On7 Prime, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.