Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's score of 85.5. Galaxy S10 5G's design is thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and they were released only 9 months apart. The Galaxy S10 5G has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a quite higher pixel amount per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a bit larger screen.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 have very similar processing units, they have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cores.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 13% bigger battery size. The Galaxy S10 5G and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 feature very similar cameras, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has a lot bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a same resolution back camera and the same camera sensor size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.