Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is slightly better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with a global score of 93.4 against 85.5. Galaxy S22 is a way newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and just a little lighter than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S22. Both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy S22 features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher display density, a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a really brighter display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3700mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a much better video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light images, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.