Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a 95.4 score against 85.5. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a way heavier phone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a little bit higher count of pixels in each display inch, a really brighter display, a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with superior battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a greater camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments, a much higher 108 megapixels resolution back camera, a way higher video resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you want to save some money, you can get Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.