Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | -- |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a bit better than Galaxy S25, with an 85.5 score against 82.6. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S25 also has a way brighter display, a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit greater pixels density.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a much larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, a larger aperture, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more megapixels back-facing camera. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and the Galaxy S25 both feature very similar batteries performance.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.