Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | -- |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Red | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 general score. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is way lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much faster processing unit than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a way brighter display, a quite bigger display, a little bit higher display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments, a back facing camera with lot more MP, a lot higher video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.