Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 global score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but both of them are equally thin. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 240 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs more money than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.