Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2018-08-29 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with an 85.5 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active has a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same brightness, the Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active feature similar batteries.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.