Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-08-29 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 overall score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is incredibly newer, but thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S7 edge features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in poorly lited environments and a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3600mAh.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.