Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 80.1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is way lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it was released just 19 months before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same sensor size, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a lot higher video quality.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.