Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even though it was released around 17 months before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch of screen, a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows 256 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 1 percent greater battery capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover Pro, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.