Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, getting a global score of 88.5 against 85.5. Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and thinner phone than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it is also a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Both have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little smaller screen, a little worse 1080 x 2246px resolution and a bit inferior pixel amount per screen inch. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has much more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Galaxy Z Flip's camera is very similar to the camera in Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although the Galaxy Z Flip has a bigger diafragm aperture, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, a same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.