Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a bit better than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, with an 85.6 score against 85.5. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer and much thinner phone than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, but it's a little bit heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit inferior pixel quantity per display inch, a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2246 resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a CPU that's very similar to the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 one, they have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or videos in low-light environments, they both have a same resolution camera in the back.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.