Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's 85.5 score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is notably newer and way thinner than Xiaomi Pocophone F1's, although it is also notably heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same resolution back camera and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a larger aperture.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.