Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's global score of 85.5. Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is newer and thinner, but also way heavier than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a larger aperture for better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.