Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-29 | -- |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black Shadow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, having a 91.1 score against 85.5. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's construction is way thinner but notably heavier than Xiaomi Pocophone F1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater performance than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite lower pixel quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a larger screen, a better resolution of 1968 x 2184px and a lot brighter screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.