Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-29 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, getting a global score of 85.5 against 81.4. Even though the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, we must tell that it is also thicker and somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite brighter display and a just a bit better screen pixels density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way better resolution camera.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.