Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-08-29 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 16.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, having a overall score of 85.5 against 76. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's, although it's a little bit heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2246, a quite larger display and a just a bit greater pixel density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a way less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a larger sensor and a larger camera aperture to take better low light images and video. The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 2 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.