Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 415.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's 76.6 global score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a just a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but both are 0.35inches thick. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera, a larger camera aperture and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.