Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | ZTE |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-08-29 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black, Ochre and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 415.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 16.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, with a overall score of 85.5 against 76.6. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, we must note that it is also older, somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2246 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 744 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although the ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro and Xiaomi Pocophone F1 have very similar batteries performance. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better camera than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a way tinier sensor capturing way worse quality photographs and videos, a tinier camera aperture and a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.