Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting an 85 score against 71.7. The Apple iPhone 8 body is newer, a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. The Apple iPhone 8 has a quite superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 8 features a display that is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime one, although the iPhone 8 has a lot lesser pixels per inch of display, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334px and a little smaller display. Apple iPhone 8 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity against 1821mAh. IPhone 8 captures better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a much better (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.