Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, with a general score of 84.5 against 71.7. IPhone XS Max's body is newer and thinner, but extremely heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Apple iPhone XS Max features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a bigger display, a just a little greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. IPhone XS Max shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime features a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with greater battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone XS Max, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.