Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-11-07 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.56 x 2.74 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 133.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, getting an 84.9 score against 71.7. The Samsung Galaxy A80 body is extremely newer than the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime's, but it's a little thicker and heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A80 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A80 has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A80 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A80 takes greater pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime, because it has a way better 48 MP resolution back camera, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.