Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-07-15 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.49 x 3.03 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.91 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Carbon grey, Ocean green and Sky blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 126.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G25 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9A's general score of 68.2. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 is incredibly older than the Xiaomi Redmi 9A, it's design is thinner and way lighter. The Google Pixel 2 features a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a way greater display pixels density.
The Google Pixel 2 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 captures greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality. The Xiaomi Redmi 9A features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 is a bit more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi 9A, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.