Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2021-01-18 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's score of 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 construction is just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, although it's a little heavier and was released 2 years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has much more memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.