Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a general score of 78.2, which is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T is an a lot older and noticeably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi was able to make it a little bit lighter anyway. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi 9T has the older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a larger screen, a just a little better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a much larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a way higher video definition, a back camera with more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a little better battery performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.