Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a general score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL's general score of 81.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's design is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but also heavier than Google Pixel XL. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and much less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a way better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.