Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Mystic indigo |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, having a global score of 82.4 against 79.7. Both phones we are comparing work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's body has the same weight than the Moto G Stylus, but it's thinner.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite worse pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has better battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.