Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-03-24 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's global score of 82.4. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is somewhat thicker and just a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with Android 11 operating system.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, more pixels per display inch and a little larger display. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A32 count with extremely similar batteries, although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 5020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.