Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-24 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A60, having an 82.4 score against 82.3. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro body is newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A60. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a better looking display than Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A60. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a 5020mAh battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.