Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-03-24 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black and White |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A8 Star's score of 82.1. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the older 11 version and Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's design is incredibly newer, but a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Galaxy A8 Star.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bit better pixels density, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star. They have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little bit better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 108 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features longer battery life than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.