Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-24 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 82.4. Despite being the best in this comparison review, we must highlight that it is also a notably older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker device. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rates and a much smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.