Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray | Black and White |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5020mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 82.4 score against 77.8. Despite of the fact the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is older and way thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the previous 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, a really brighter screen, a little bit better pixel density and a larger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a camera with a way worse 50 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a much better video quality.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.