Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-04-20 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, getting an 84.7 score against 78.3. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A32 is a somewhat heavier and just a little thicker device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with Android 11 OS.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a much higher screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels and the same aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 and Galaxy A32 both count with really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.