Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 general score. The Apple iPhone XS Max construction is just a little thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it's somewhat heavier and was released many years before. The iPhone XS Max features a quite superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit better screen than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a really brighter screen. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, they both have a same size camera aperture.
IPhone XS Max and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S count with really similar memory for apps and games, both have equal 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a way better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.