Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with an 81.6 score against 78.2. Google Pixel 2 is an way older phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, but Google managed to build it a little thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen.
Google Pixel 2 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 2 shoots clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels, they both have a same size aperture. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85% greater battery size.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.