Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a score of 81.3 against 78.2. Although Google Pixel XL is extremely older and a bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's construction is still just a little bit lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a just a little inferior pixels quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Google Pixel XL has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has more cores and more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel XL has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos and a back facing camera with a much lower resolution.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.